<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Progressive step or recipe for disaster?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.london-student.net/2009/11/01/progressive-step-or-recipe-for-disaster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.london-student.net/2009/11/01/progressive-step-or-recipe-for-disaster/</link>
	<description>Europe&#039;s largest independent student newspaper - the voice of 120,000 students</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2146 04:22:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Zamora Moreno</title>
		<link>http://www.london-student.net/2009/11/01/progressive-step-or-recipe-for-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-71330</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Zamora Moreno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.london-student.net/?p=1321#comment-71330</guid>
		<description>thanks - interesting article. Cool to see this idea is actually being considered by so many.

With regards to equal income:

What about a Dual Economy - where one money-type, for instance &#039;life-money&#039;, is given to All equally from birth as a steady income, enough money to have a dignified life and end all poverty - and a second money-type that specifically functions as &#039;wage-money&#039; as the money one gets payed with for doing any type of Labour and that one can spend on extra-luxuries on top of the provisions that are available with the &#039;life-money&#039; as housing, basic healthcare, education, food, clean water?   

This should provide a stable foundation for equality and a solution all should be able to make peace with

The point of productivity being much higher than what all of humanity can possibly consume or even use should have raised this matter a long time ago - the current system has become absurd and only continues to exist because of vested interests that have very little to do with Human progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks &#8211; interesting article. Cool to see this idea is actually being considered by so many.</p>
<p>With regards to equal income:</p>
<p>What about a Dual Economy &#8211; where one money-type, for instance &#8216;life-money&#8217;, is given to All equally from birth as a steady income, enough money to have a dignified life and end all poverty &#8211; and a second money-type that specifically functions as &#8216;wage-money&#8217; as the money one gets payed with for doing any type of Labour and that one can spend on extra-luxuries on top of the provisions that are available with the &#8216;life-money&#8217; as housing, basic healthcare, education, food, clean water?   </p>
<p>This should provide a stable foundation for equality and a solution all should be able to make peace with</p>
<p>The point of productivity being much higher than what all of humanity can possibly consume or even use should have raised this matter a long time ago &#8211; the current system has become absurd and only continues to exist because of vested interests that have very little to do with Human progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://www.london-student.net/2009/11/01/progressive-step-or-recipe-for-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-71294</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.london-student.net/?p=1321#comment-71294</guid>
		<description>It makes so much sense! I can&#039;t understand why, especially in this recession, politicians aren&#039;t talking about this in the UK. Surely it would solve so many problems. Is it merely the fear of change that is preventing this idea to spread like wildfire or is there a huge obstacle somewhere that I&#039;m missing completely? 

I am going to tell everyone I know about this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes so much sense! I can&#8217;t understand why, especially in this recession, politicians aren&#8217;t talking about this in the UK. Surely it would solve so many problems. Is it merely the fear of change that is preventing this idea to spread like wildfire or is there a huge obstacle somewhere that I&#8217;m missing completely? </p>
<p>I am going to tell everyone I know about this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.london-student.net/2009/11/01/progressive-step-or-recipe-for-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-71276</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.london-student.net/?p=1321#comment-71276</guid>
		<description>An excellent idea.  This would eliminate poverty forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent idea.  This would eliminate poverty forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
