<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UCL Tory &#8217;sorry&#8217; for Enoch Powell article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.london-student.net/2009/11/02/ucl-tory-sorry-for-enoch-powell-article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.london-student.net/2009/11/02/ucl-tory-sorry-for-enoch-powell-article/</link>
	<description>Europe&#039;s largest independent student newspaper - the voice of 120,000 students</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2146 04:22:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.london-student.net/2009/11/02/ucl-tory-sorry-for-enoch-powell-article/comment-page-1/#comment-71297</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.london-student.net/?p=1340#comment-71297</guid>
		<description>Why does everybody apologise for admitting that Enoch had a point. Most politicans now readily accept that immigration has been at too great a level for too long. How on earth could it considered controversial to claim that Powell&#039;s speech was foresighted. It absolutely was. It seems like most people approach this issue in a hysterical frame of mind. Powell&#039;s estimates on immigration numbers were correct (and actually understated) - therefore its ludicrous to take offence at somebody saying that he showed foresight. 74% of the British public at the time supported Powell according to a Gallup poll and it can be shown that he attracted 3 million votes to the Conservative party in the 1970 election. He was indeed foresighted, foresight was an aspect of his stunning intellect - the sort of intellect that enabled him to become a professor at 24. I wish people would stop tarnishing this man&#039;s memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does everybody apologise for admitting that Enoch had a point. Most politicans now readily accept that immigration has been at too great a level for too long. How on earth could it considered controversial to claim that Powell&#8217;s speech was foresighted. It absolutely was. It seems like most people approach this issue in a hysterical frame of mind. Powell&#8217;s estimates on immigration numbers were correct (and actually understated) &#8211; therefore its ludicrous to take offence at somebody saying that he showed foresight. 74% of the British public at the time supported Powell according to a Gallup poll and it can be shown that he attracted 3 million votes to the Conservative party in the 1970 election. He was indeed foresighted, foresight was an aspect of his stunning intellect &#8211; the sort of intellect that enabled him to become a professor at 24. I wish people would stop tarnishing this man&#8217;s memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
